Greg Maxwell, a Bitcoin Core developer has recently criticized the overwhelming fearmongering in case of a 51% attack.  The expert states that all of the panic for such an attack on the bitcoin blockchain, is raised by people with a fundamental lack of understanding about bitcoin itself.
Maxwell’s Reddit post was published last week and in it, he argued that so far, all of the mechanisms which were developed to combat the threat of a potential 51% attack on the bitcoin blockchain, heavily implied centralization and were in fact a far bigger threat to bitcoin than the attack itself.
The 51% attack itself does take a lot of resources. The majority of cybersecurity experts have concluded that the resources required to pull of such an attack on the bitcoin blockchain would be nigh impossible to acquire.
Last year, the cybersecurity researcher “geocold51” showed that small-scale cryptocurrencies were actually quite vulnerable to a 51% attack.
51% attacks usually occur on blockchains which use the proof-of-work (PoW) algorithm. The person or group behind the attack seizes control of the majority (51%) of the mining power and monopolizes control over the network.
A 51% attack can have devastating consequences for any blockchain
If successful, the user in control can now reverse transactions and begin to double-spend. Basically, the user in control transacts crypto for fiat and then simply rolls back the transaction to return the crypto and still pocket the fiat.
Maxwell said multiple times that any of the proposed suggestions threaten to compromise bitcoin’s centralization which is the heart of the project itself. He noted that bitcoin focuses on solving the problem of having consensus based on a stable history of transactions.
Maxwell also pointed out centralized systems like Ripple, EOS and IOT resorted to having a single party determine firstness and imposing their decision on the rest of the network.
He is completely right as bitcoin’s decentralized nature relies on “voting” of computing power through mining without any involvement from a third party. According to the Bitcoin Core developer, any mechanism would allow for a very easy rigging of this vote by 1 or more parties. He stated:
“People have thought up of more than a thousand different ways to allegedly do it without introducing centralization. The reality of the situation is however, that the proposed fixes always centralize the system, the just hide it better and better each time.”
You can also check out:

The Most Trusted Crypto Exchange Platforms in 2020
Thursday January 16, 2020

Coinspeaker The Most Trusted Crypto Exchange Platforms in 2020Crypto exchange platforms provide a crucial segment in the wider community as it allows the public to have access to cryptocurrencies. Unlike the stock and Forex markets, the crypto market is open 24/7 and cryptocurrency exchanges facilitate this. There are only four ways through which the public […]

The post The Most Trusted Crypto Exchange Platforms in 2020 appeared first on 12bit trade.

Blockchain Gambling: The Inevitable Progression
Bitcoin Bounce Back During the First Day: Rough Week Ahead
Accept Bitcoin: How Quickly the World Changed in 10 Years
MasterBlock: A Unique Time-Piece with an Amazing Secret

Thursday January 01, 1970

The post 51% Attack Solutions Lead to More Centralization According to Core Dev appeared first on CoinStaker | Bitcoin News.

Adam Schefter Expects Josh McDaniels To Be Popular Head-Coaching Candidate
Friday December 14, 2018

The NFL coaching carousel never truly stops spinning, and Josh McDaniels always seems to be along for the ride. That appears to be the case again this season, as two teams — the Cleveland Browns and Green Bay Packers — already have fired their head coaches, and more coaches likely will suffer similar fates once […]

The post Adam Schefter Expects Josh McDaniels To Be Popular Head-Coaching Candidate appeared first on 12bet - Bet365.