Greg Maxwell, a Bitcoin Core developer has recently criticized the overwhelming fearmongering in case of a 51% attack.  The expert states that all of the panic for such an attack on the bitcoin blockchain, is raised by people with a fundamental lack of understanding about bitcoin itself.
Maxwell’s Reddit post was published last week and in it, he argued that so far, all of the mechanisms which were developed to combat the threat of a potential 51% attack on the bitcoin blockchain, heavily implied centralization and were in fact a far bigger threat to bitcoin than the attack itself.
The 51% attack itself does take a lot of resources. The majority of cybersecurity experts have concluded that the resources required to pull of such an attack on the bitcoin blockchain would be nigh impossible to acquire.
Last year, the cybersecurity researcher “geocold51” showed that small-scale cryptocurrencies were actually quite vulnerable to a 51% attack.
51% attacks usually occur on blockchains which use the proof-of-work (PoW) algorithm. The person or group behind the attack seizes control of the majority (51%) of the mining power and monopolizes control over the network.
A 51% attack can have devastating consequences for any blockchain
If successful, the user in control can now reverse transactions and begin to double-spend. Basically, the user in control transacts crypto for fiat and then simply rolls back the transaction to return the crypto and still pocket the fiat.
Maxwell said multiple times that any of the proposed suggestions threaten to compromise bitcoin’s centralization which is the heart of the project itself. He noted that bitcoin focuses on solving the problem of having consensus based on a stable history of transactions.
Maxwell also pointed out centralized systems like Ripple, EOS and IOT resorted to having a single party determine firstness and imposing their decision on the rest of the network.
He is completely right as bitcoin’s decentralized nature relies on “voting” of computing power through mining without any involvement from a third party. According to the Bitcoin Core developer, any mechanism would allow for a very easy rigging of this vote by 1 or more parties. He stated:
“People have thought up of more than a thousand different ways to allegedly do it without introducing centralization. The reality of the situation is however, that the proposed fixes always centralize the system, the just hide it better and better each time.”
You can also check out:

Analysts: Bitwise ETF Rejection Could Spell Doom for the Industry
Tuesday October 15, 2019

The Bitwise proposal for a bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) was recently knocked to the side by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This was bad news all by itself, but many analysts are seeing the rejection as a sign of how the industry will wind up. Bitwise Rejection Means a Lot to Analysts Some view […]

The post Analysts: Bitwise ETF Rejection Could Spell Doom for the Industry appeared first on 12bit trade.

Blockchain Gambling: The Inevitable Progression
Bitcoin Bounce Back During the First Day: Rough Week Ahead
Accept Bitcoin: How Quickly the World Changed in 10 Years
MasterBlock: A Unique Time-Piece with an Amazing Secret


Thursday January 01, 1970

The post 51% Attack Solutions Lead to More Centralization According to Core Dev appeared first on CoinStaker | Bitcoin News.

Carmelo Anthony News: Something ‘Happened’ Between Houston Rockets & Melo Says Analyst
Saturday December 15, 2018

Carmelo Anthony and the Houston Rockets may have had a “falling out,” which could have led Melo and the team to part ways. NBA analyst Chris Sheridan chatted with me on the Scoop B Radio Podcast last week and says that something happened between the team that “they don’t want out yet.” “Still trying to […]

The post Carmelo Anthony News: Something ‘Happened’ Between Houston Rockets & Melo Says Analyst appeared first on 12bet - Bet365.